Wednesday, January 14, 2015

BREAKING: Leftist CA AG Kamala Harris Running For U.S. Senate

California Attorney General Kamala Harris
Photo by Jason Merritt
(Source: Examiner.com article)
... to fill the seat soon-to-be vacated by Senator Barbara Boxer (Dimwit–CA). Charlie Foxtrot covered Boxer's retirement the other day.

Dave Workman reports on this new development:
California Attorney General Kamala Harris is “all in” as a candidate to replace retiring Senator Barbara Boxer as the next anti-gun Democrat to represent the Golden State in Washington, D.C., the San Francisco Chronicle is reporting this morning. (link in original)
I can't honestly say I'm surprised. A young(ish) anti-gun "Progressive" Democrat moonbat is running to replace an old anti-gun "Progressive" Democrat moonbat. As Mr. Workman also notes, I guess we should be thankful former CA State Sen. Leland Yee (Dunce–8) isn't running? Or worse yet (in my opinion), current CA State Sen. Kevin deLeón (Dolt–24)?

The question is: What can/will California's gun owning population do about it?

Stay safe.

Tuesday, January 13, 2015

Quote of the Day — Gov. John A. Kitzhaber, M.D. (January 12, 2015)

From his (unprecedented*) fourth inaugural speech (transcript here):
I have learned that the role of government is not to fix things but to create the space in which people can fix things themselves.
Truer ideas are rarely spoken, but in this instance, it is a lie. Not the part about the role of government — he's 100% correct there — but the part where he says, "I have learned...."

If he had learned this, he wouldn't be trying his hardest to use government as a tool to fix things, as he's still trying to do. If he had learned this, he'd be getting the government out of the way, and letting people fix things themselves.

I could say more — and might later — but it'd turn into a rant.

Stay safe.
------------
* - Every news channel is calling Gov. Kitzhaber's fourth term "unprecedented". Every. Single. One. While it's true that no other person has held the governor's seat for four terms, it's getting monotonous.

Sunday, January 11, 2015

The New Tactical Reality - Michael Bane

Michael Bane has long been a noted thinker, nae - a philosopher, in the field of self-defense. He stands out in an discipline dominated by the "Shoot 'em - with cool moves and cool stuff" crowd." When he opines about a new form of terrorism and it's impact on an individual's self-protection needs, you best listen - hard.  

Michael Bane
(Outdoor Channel)








The Paris jihadi attacks illustrate a new phase in the war against Western Civilization. The extremists have learned to democratize terror: now, anyone can be a terrorist, and everyone can be a victim. As those at the French magazine, supermarket and print shop found, the new face of terrorism can appear at any place, at any moment, in any guise. You best be ready. A damn good first step would be to read Bane's blogpost: 

The New Tactical Reality

Then, hit the Stratfor, Rand and Gabe Suarez links he provides. 
 
You should note the resemblance of the new jihadi tactics to the Alinsky-tinged ones being employed by the Hands Up - Don't Shoot activists. Food for thought - and worry.  

HT: saysuncle.com


Friday, January 9, 2015

Quote of the Day — Kemberlee Kaye (January 8, 2015)

From her post over at Legal Insurrection, "Heartbroken for Charlie Hebdo":
We will always battle those who hate truth, and those who hate truth will always try to extinguish it. It is incumbent upon those that speak the truth to do so bravely, unabashedly, especially in the face of evil. Truth is what Charlie Hebdo chose. The price was twelve lives.

My hope is that in their bravery, we find resolve. And in that resolve, we awake to a fresh realization that freedom is never free. Should the day ever arrive, are we willing to pay the price Truth too often requires?

I hope I am.
Amen.

The outpouring of support we've been seeing has been downright inspiring, especially that from fellow cartoonists, who but for the grace of God could have been targeted, too. If a picture is worth a thousand words, then more free expression and grief has been put to paper than I have space to write.

From resident Legal Insurrection cartoonist A.F. Branco:


From illustrator Lucille Clerc:
(retrieved from The Independent)

From The Independent's cartoonist Dave Brown:

From Rob Tornoe (posted on Twitter):

From Satish Acharya (posted on Twitter):

From David Pope (posted on Twitter):

Cartoonists the world over, creating thousands of images in solidarity and protest, unwilling to allow the terrorists to win more than a temporary, fleeting victory.

Amen to that, too.

Stay safe.

Thursday, January 8, 2015

BREAKING: Barbara Boxer (Leftist California US Senator) To Retire!

One of the most virulent anti-gun, reliably hard leftist - and not coincidentally, perhaps the dumbest of all senior California politicians - has announced that this will be her last term as a US Senator. 

Heil Babs Boxer
(timesunion.com)
California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer won't seek re-election in 2016

Although her retirement from national politics is a cause for celebration, the thought of what will replace her is gut-wrenching. 

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

BREAKING: Terrorist Attack/Shooting at Satirical Newspaper in Paris, France [UPDATED: IT'S (not) OVER!]

At least 12 dead, five seriously injured, and a manhunt is on for the three terrorists.


[UPDATE 1: Jan. 7, afternoon] Via the live feed at the Mirror Online, the suspects have reportedly been identified and apprehended 100 miles from the massacre site, but thus far there has been little in the way of confirmation. I won't do them the honor of naming them here.

The suspects were reportedly identified from an ID card one of them left in one of the stolen cars they used and abandoned. They also reportedly initially tried to break into the wrong building, but were told by two maintenance workers that Charlie Hebdo was located two doors over. The terrorists then killed one of the workers for the trouble.

Finally, in a twist that surprises precisely no one, at least one of them has a criminal record that would preclude him from legally owning firearms, and that involved sending jihad fighters to Iraq.[/UPDATE 1]

[UPDATE 2: Jan. 8, 9:25 am PST] Checking the live feeds again, The Guardian is reporting that one of the suspects has turned himself in to police after seeing his name published. He's maintaining his innocence, claiming he was in school at the time (he's 18 years old; it's both plausible and easily verified or discredited).

Several other people have been arrested in connection with the massacre, but the other two masked killers who actually did the shooting are still at large.

The Guardian rotates its live blogs periodically. The link above is still active, but is no longer being updated. Current live-news-blogging as of this update is here, but I'll still be posting updates. Stay tuned. It's going to be a bumpy ride, I think. Continued thoughts and prayers to all those involved, and all of us. [/UPDATE 2]

[UPDATE 3: Jan. 9, 8:50 am PST] No big changes yesterday afternoon, so I didn't post an update as I had intended. The Guardian rolled over their live updates to here, but there was little new information. Suspects still at large, they have links to al-Qaeda, they were born in Paris to Algerian parents (didn't I predict they were Frenchmen?).

Continuing live updates here at The Guardian. I'm typing this as I'm reading through the latest, but as of this posting it looks like French authorities had them pinned down in a printing shop in Dammartin-en-Goele, and they had at least one hostage. Another hostage situation with another set of suspects — linked to the slaying of a policewoman — developed at a kosher market in porte de Vincennes.

At last update, it appears the Charlie Hebdo terrorists died in a police raid at the print shop, and the other suspects have been "neutralised" (reports differ on what this means) in another, seemingly-coordinated raid moments later. The print shop hostage is safe, and five market hostages were freed (no report yet on how many there were). [Addendum, Jan. 9, 11:00 am PST] It's now confirmed that four hostages were killed before the police action, out of a total of 16 taken before the police arrived (some were later released). These are the only confirmed deaths so far, other than the suspects themselves. Also, the kosher market was reportedly targeted because "it was Jewish". [/Addendum]

So it appears to be over, thank God. As much as I would have liked to see the suspects arrested and forced to stand trial, justice has been served. Unless something else big happens, this will be the last update at this site (and if something that big happens, it will probably deserve its own post).

If you've stuck with me so far, thank you for reading, and stay safe. [/UPDATE 3]

[UPDATE 4: Jan. 9 3:25 pm PST] OK, so it's not entirely yet. The girlfriend of the hostage-taker in the kosher market is still at large, wanted in connection to the policewoman slaying, and considered armed and dangerous. This, along with the other suspects' families and close associates who are still being detained, appears to be the last loose end before it truly is "over".

Again, thank you for reading. [/UPDATE 4]

Via the New York Times:
(source: Mirror Online)
PARIS — Three masked gunmen shouting "Allahu akbar!" stormed the Paris offices of a satirical newspaper Wednesday, killing 12 people, including its editor, before escaping in a car. It was France's deadliest postwar terrorist attack.

Security forces were hunting for the gunmen who spoke flawless, unaccented French in the military-style noon-time attack on the weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo, located near Paris' Bastille monument. The publication's caricatures of the Prophet Muhammed have frequently drawn condemnation from Muslims.

President Francois Hollande called the slayings "a terrorist attack without a doubt," and said several other attacks have been thwarted in France "in recent weeks."

[…]

There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack, which also left four people critically wounded, and was condemned by world leaders as an attack on freedom of expression, but praised by supporters of the militant Islamic State group.

Clad all in black with hoods and carrying machine guns, the attackers forced one of the cartoonists arriving at the office building with her young daughter to open the door with a security code.

The staff was in an editorial meeting and the gunmen headed straight for the paper's editor, Stephane Charbonnier — widely known by his pen name Charb — killing him and his police bodyguard first, said Christophe Crepin, a police union spokesman. Minutes later, two men strolled out to a black car waiting below, calmly firing on a police officer, with one gunman shooting him in the head as he writhed on the ground, according to video.
(underline emphasis mine — we'll go over those parts below the fold)
Terrorists about to execute a police officer
(source: CBS News)
Before we go into the details, let me first offer my sincerest condolences to the families and friends of those killed or injured in this cowardly and obscene attack. May God grant them His comfort and peace.

Because initial reports for events like this tend to be … not 100% accurate, I'll be correcting any inconsistencies as I get more information. However, this much seems perfectly clear: 12 people — journalists, cartoonists, editors, and police officers — are dead, all because of some "controversial" cartoons of the devil-worshiping child-rapist "prophet" Mohammed.

12 people dead. For a satirical cartoon.

There's something fundamentally wrong with a world view that not only forbids having a sense of humor about yourself, but also forbids you from allowing others to have a sense of humor, on pain of a brutal and violent death.

To that end, I applaud the staff and editors at the Charlie Hebdo. They've received threats before, and the building has been firebombed over previous cartoons of the devil-worshiping child-rapist "prophet" Mohammed, but they've stuck to their proverbial guns. Their commitment to their satirical art and writing is absolute.

They are paragons of free speech and free expression. As always, the answer to a challenge against free speech — or a demand of censorship — is more speech, not less.

May we all be so bold and steadfast in our beliefs.

(Click through for the political/tactical analysis)

Quote of the Day — Kevin (January 5, 2015)

From a post where he, in turn, is quoting Mike Rowe (yes, THAT Mike Rowe):
As others have observed, "Democracy works for those who show up." Making sure as few as possible show up … is not a coincidence. It's a strategy.
If you're not involving yourself in the political process(es), you're part of the problem. I've been hearing a lot of "I didn't like either candidate so I didn't vote" kinds of excuses. That's all they are: excuses. Staying home as a form of "protest" doesn't work.

It's really very simple: The powers-that-be do not hear your silence as "protest" — they hear your silence as "consent".

And that is why getting involved in the political process is one of my resolutions for the New Year.

Stay safe.

Tuesday, January 6, 2015

Videos: This Math Stuff is Hard!!!

If you're travelling at 80 mph, how long will it take you to go 80 miles?


Tough question?

Yea, not really. But you couldn't tell that to some people:


10 minutes? No. 80 minutes? No. 8 minutes? No.

America's education standards, broadcast for the world to see. But at least she gets it in the end.

Unlike others asked the same question:


Note that the video cuts off before they come to the correct answer.

Sometimes, I fear for the future of America's youth. Other times, I'm positively terrified for it.

But then, I find another example that give me hope:


"1 hour." No hesitation, no uncertainty. Amen, brother.

Stay safe.

Sunday, January 4, 2015

There’s a Gun in My House

And I'm strangely OK with it.
 
Paula Bolyard of PJ Media

Winning the gun rights battle, one blinding flash of the obvious at a time.   ;)

Good on Paula, and congrats to the friends and salespeople that guided her journey.  We all do ourselves a huge favor when we introduce someone to shooting.

HT: Instapundit.com, PJMedia.com

Saturday, January 3, 2015

A Gunnie's New Year's Resolutions for 2015

Happy New Year, everyone!

The tradition of making personal resolutions at the start of a new year goes back to ancient times. According to the Wikipedia, the Babylonians and Romans made promises to their respective deities, and in medieval times knights would re-affirm their commitment to the code of chivalry every year after Christmas.

Good for them.

In keeping with this tradition, I'm putting up a few of mine, particularly the ones related — directly or tangentially — to promoting positive gun culture and/or improving my shooting:
  • I will shoot more often and structure my range time: You'd think this would be natural, but due to a variety of factors — limited time, limited funds, family commitments, etc. — I don't shoot anywhere near as much as I'd like or should. I also got into the trap of calling slow-fire "practice". It's not; it's just pulling the trigger, when I should be actively training. I aim to remedy both of those this year (pun intended).
  • I will take new shooters to the range with me: Part of being a good "gun culture ambassador" is introducing new people to shooting in a safe, fun environment. Thus, I'm pledging to invite new shooters — friends and family, mostly — to the range. I (regrettably) may have to ask that they chip in for range fees and/or ammo, but I'll bring the guns, eyes, and ears.
  • I will engage in pro-gun diplomacy, where and when appropriate: Another part of "gun culture ambassadorship", I will promote positive gun culture — and provide counter-points to anti-gun propaganda — any time and any place it's appropriate to do so. I will recognize when it's not appropriate (there are some times/places), and not make an ass out of myself (and by extension, all of you).
  • I will be more politically active, and encourage my representatives to vote pro-gun: This one is especially important, as it seems Oregon is the one state in the Union that came out of the mid-term elections bluer than it went in, and the Democrats, true to form, wasted no time promising to push for more "gun control". This is bad news, but I'll do my part to prevent bad gun laws (and per the last point, encourage others to get more active, too).
So that's my short list. There are others, which I might (read: probably will) get into in future posts.

What about you all? Any big resolutions?

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

Happy New Year!!!

Wishing all a happy, safe and profitable New Year!

(hdwallpaersimages.com)

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Holiday Mini-Rant — and Best Wishes

"Happy Holidays!"

That phrase usually grates on my mind. It's fingernails-on-a-blackboard. It's so "politically correct" as to be painful.

We're not allowed to say "Merry Christmas" or "Happy Hanukkah", for fear of offending non-Christians and/or non-Jews. We're told not to offer faith- or holiday-specific greetings because someone's feelings might be hurt. And so came the rise of the bland — but somehow considerate — "Happy Holidays!"

I say, "Enough!" I'm not doing it this year. Whatever religion you follow, whatever God you worship, He wants you to profess your faith and offer good tidings to your neighbors. We should all be proud to be Christians, Jews, or whatever.

So no, I won't choke back, do the politically correct thing, and wish anyone "Happy Holidays" anymore. I'd rather be a modern-day Maccabee:
The shape our country is in now, we need Maccabees, we need them badly. People that will not bow down to the false king of “Political Correctness” nor allow the sacrifice [of] good people on the alter of “tolerance” by them being put out of business, or having their TV show canceled because they talk about the Tanakh or the Bible. Nor because they choose to talk about G-d. We need people who recognize evil and teach others how to recognize it. We must become the Maccabees of today.
(Click through to read a VERY abbreviated history of the Maccabees. It's pretty awesome.)

OK, now that the rant is done, let me offer my sincerest and best (and in some cases, belated) wishes to all you and yours.

Merry Christmas.
(source: Wikipedia)

Happy Hanukkah.
(source: lds.net)

Good Yule.
(source: Why'd You Eat That?)

And Happy New Year.

Whatever you decide to celebrate, celebrate well and have a good time.

And as always, stay safe.

Monday, December 22, 2014

Quote of the Day — Grace-Marie Turner (December 19, 2014)

Today's Quote of the Day comes from Grace-Marie Turner, of the Galen Institute (as quoted by John Fund's article at National Review Online), regarding the viability of "single-payer" health-care systems.

First, a little background:

Vermont — a highly-liberal Deep Blue state — opted to go above-and-beyond their obligations when it came to implementation of the Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare). Instead of offering a public-funded health-care option, they chose to go full single-payer.

Naturally, it didn't work. Democratic State Governor Peter Shumlin just conceded that the $2 billion price tag (that's "billion", with a 'B') was too high, taxes would sky-rocket too much, and that his State's single-payer system could not be done.

Who'da thunk it? I mean, besides Republican Gubernatorial candidate Scott Milne, who — before the election — predicted this admission would come out ... wait for it ... after the election.

Which brings us to the Quote of the Day:
If Vermont can’t make it work, single-payer can’t work anywhere in the country where the economy has free and competitive markets. It’s more evidence that centralized government health care is simply not workable in America.
Zing!

Just a bit more background (from Census.gov and Vermont's Dept. of Labor, Economic & Labor Market Information): Vermont's population (2013 est.) is 626,630. The working-age demographic (over 18 years, less than 65) makes up 64% of the total population, which Vermont reports as 351,800 people. They have 4.4% unemployment, which means they should have plenty of workers contributing (via taxes) to run this program.

And it still couldn't be done. One more time, with feeling: If Vermont can't make it work, single-payer can't work anywhere with free, competitive markets.

Stay safe.

[Hat tip: Aleister, writing for Legal Insurrection.]

Friday, December 19, 2014

Friday Afternoon Tab Clearing — 12/19/2014

I've had a few items building up in my tabs that deserve sharing, but I don't have enough extra thoughts to add (or time!) to justify their own posts. So, it's time for a tab clearing!

From Rob Morse at his Slow Facts blog, a quick look at the evolution of our response to and preparation for violent crime. A nice compare/contrast from where we (most of us, anyway) were versus where we are now.

Jeff Knox, writing at the Buckeye Firearms Association, about Nathan Scott, the FSU student and Students for Concealed Carry on Campus activist who was shot in the leg Nov. 20 by a disturbed former student who opened fire in the campus library. Scott has a Concealed Weapon License, but — being a law-abiding citizen under a "No Guns on Campus" law — he didn't have his gun. The deranged shooter, of course, was not inconvenienced in the slightest by such a trivial law.

Families across the country are apparently offering up their loved ones to be the "next Michael Brown". I just have to ask, what kind of sick individuals would try to capitalize on the death of a loved one?

Bluegrass Bruce reports on the Bloomberg-funded "Universal Background Check" initiative making its way in Nevada. Violations of relevant rules have been reported, documented, and ultimately ignored by Nevada's Secretary of State, who certified the petitions as valid. And the NRA is thus far staying silent, but hopefully they've learned from Washington State's experience.

On that note, Joe Huffman asks, "What if?" in regards to Initiative 594. The law still needs to be overturned or repealed, but in the meantime, what if they passed a bad law and nobody complied? What if they passed a bad law, and loopholes were expanded (legally!) to make it totally meaningless?

Also from Joe Huffman, regarding the lawsuit against Bushmaster from the Sandy Hook victims' families, "Why Just the Gun Manufacturer?" Why not sue every manufacturer of every single component of every single item the shooter used that day?

Via ASM826 (co-blogging at Borepatch's site), a set of Animagraffs animations on how a 1911 pistol functions. They do some neat stuff.

From Miguel, an article from the Daily Mail Online about "Operation Fast & Furious", with crime-scene photos (WARNING: not for the faint of heart or stomach, but illustrative of the kind of inhuman monsters employed by the drug cartels). The primary cited source is Judicial Watch, so I guess their FOIA efforts to get around Obama's "executive privilege" must be paying off. Now, if only we could get the press to stop with the "botched trafficking sting" line. It wasn't "botched", people! The guns weren't tracked because BATFE/DOJ didn't even TRY to track them! Calling it a "botched" or "failed" sting removes or mitigates BATFE's/DOJ's liability and responsibility.

That's it for now. Stay safe, everyone.

Eight Children Stabbed To Death in Cairns, Australia

Tell me again how Australia is so much better after they outlawed guns. 

Eight children from same family stabbed to death in Cairns

Evil will find a way. Good has to actively resist it.