For the last
week I’ve been unsuccessfully bludgeoning a post on Abramski vs. United States, the Supreme
Court's recent ruling on straw purchases. Beyond its support of portions of the 1993
Brady Bill, I thought the SCOTUS opinion was an important illustration of the nature of
laws, their costs, unintended consequences, and the unwarranted criminalization of everyday
acts.
As I developed my thesis, issues kept poking their
noses under the tent. Most were eagerly welcome expansions, some were not, all required
additional research, thought, and bloviating. I ended up with a Gordian’s Knot
of analysis paralysis and writer’s bowel block. What was emerging was exactly what I did not
want in this blog: an overlong, nuanced, multipart, dense magnum opus. Abramski vs. United States has been put aside. I’ll probably pull the meatiest portions apart for future blog posts. However, Blogging. Will. Restart.
No comments:
Post a Comment